In the ever-evolving landscape of international trade, few sectors are as fiercely protected as agriculture. For India, where farming sustains nearly half the population, the idea of opening up the sector to American imports under pressure from US tariffs is met with strong resistance. The Trump administration’s aggressive trade policies, including tariffs and demands for greater market access, have reignited debates over India’s agricultural sovereignty, food security, and economic sustainability. But why does India hesitate to comply with these demands, and what are the larger implications of this standoff?
The US-India Trade Rift: A Brief Background
During Donald Trump’s presidency, the US pursued a protectionist trade agenda, imposing tariffs on several countries, including India. In 2018, the US levied tariffs on Indian steel and aluminum exports, citing national security concerns. India retaliated with its own tariffs on American agricultural products, including apples, almonds, and walnuts.
But the tensions escalated further when Trump revoked India’s preferential trade status under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) in 2019. The US sought greater access to the Indian market for agricultural goods, dairy, and medical devices. India, however, resisted demands that would have opened the floodgates to American farm products, fearing dire consequences for its farmers and domestic food supply.
Why India Resists US Agricultural Imports
1. Protecting Small Farmers from Industrial Agriculture
India’s agriculture sector is vastly different from America’s. While the US agricultural industry is dominated by large-scale agribusinesses with heavy mechanization and subsidies, India’s farming landscape is primarily smallholder-driven. Over 86% of Indian farmers own less than two hectares of land. These farmers struggle with unpredictable monsoons, rising input costs, and market fluctuations.
Allowing unrestricted American agricultural imports would expose these farmers to intense competition from highly subsidized US agribusinesses. Unlike American farmers, who receive billions of dollars in subsidies, Indian farmers have limited government support. If cheap US farm products flood Indian markets, domestic producers may face price crashes, leading to widespread distress in rural India.
2. Dairy Industry Concerns and Religious Sentiments
One of the most contentious issues between India and the US in trade negotiations has been dairy imports. India’s dairy sector is not only a significant economic contributor but also deeply intertwined with cultural and religious traditions. American dairy products often come from cows fed with animal-derived feeds, which goes against the vegetarian principles followed by many Indians.
Moreover, India’s dairy industry, largely composed of small-scale farmers and cooperatives like Amul, fears being overshadowed by large American dairy corporations. Opening the sector could disrupt millions of livelihoods, making India cautious about lifting restrictions.
3. The GMO Controversy and Food Sovereignty
Another significant factor in India’s reluctance to open its agriculture sector to the US is the controversy surrounding genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The US is a major producer of genetically modified crops, including corn, soybeans, and wheat. India, however, has taken a cautious approach toward GMOs, citing concerns over food safety, environmental impact, and seed sovereignty.
Also read: INTERVIEW | Ashutosh Tiwari on Scaling India’s Agri Value Chain with Nkosh’s Digital Innovation
If India allows US agricultural imports, it could lead to an influx of GMO products, undermining domestic regulatory frameworks. Many Indian farmers rely on traditional seed varieties, and fears of seed monopolization by American agribusiness giants like Monsanto (now Bayer) have sparked strong resistance.
4. The Threat to India’s Self-Sufficiency in Food Production
India has made significant strides in achieving food self-sufficiency since the Green Revolution of the 1960s. Today, it is one of the world’s largest producers of rice, wheat, and pulses. While India still faces challenges in storage and distribution, it largely meets its domestic food demand through local production.
Opening the agricultural sector to US imports could increase dependency on foreign food supplies, potentially undermining national food security. During times of global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or geopolitical disruptions, reliance on imports can lead to price shocks and shortages.
The US Argument: Why Washington Wants Indian Market Access
From the US perspective, India’s protectionist policies create an uneven playing field. The American government argues that while Indian products enjoy access to US markets, India places high tariffs and non-tariff barriers on American farm goods. The US almond and walnut industries, for instance, have been particularly vocal about India’s tariffs, as India is their largest export market.
Additionally, US trade officials argue that removing barriers could benefit Indian consumers by offering lower prices and greater variety. However, this argument overlooks the broader socio-economic impact on Indian farmers and food producers.
What’s at Stake for India?
Economic Fallout and Farmer Protests
The Indian government has already faced significant unrest over agricultural reforms. The 2020-21 farmers’ protests against the three farm laws highlighted deep-seated fears about corporate control over agriculture. Any move to allow large-scale American agricultural imports could reignite such protests, particularly if farmers perceive it as a threat to their incomes.
Strategic and Diplomatic Considerations
India must also navigate its relationship with the US carefully. While both nations see each other as strategic partners in defense and technology, trade disputes remain a sticking point. India cannot afford to completely alienate the US, especially as it seeks to counterbalance China’s influence in global trade.
However, India also has alternatives. It has been strengthening trade ties with other countries and regional blocs, including the European Union and ASEAN, to diversify its trade partnerships.
Finding a Middle Ground
India and the US must find a balanced approach that considers the concerns of both sides. Here are a few potential solutions:
- Gradual Market Opening with Safeguards – India can negotiate phased market access for American agricultural products while implementing safety nets for domestic farmers, such as price stabilization measures.
- Quality and Standards Alignment – India can insist on stringent quality standards for US imports, including labeling requirements for GMOs, to protect consumers and local farmers.
- Bilateral Agricultural Partnerships – Instead of mere import-export deals, India and the US can collaborate on agricultural technology transfer, infrastructure development, and sustainable farming practices.
- Retaining Tariffs but Offering Selective Concessions – India could maintain tariffs on sensitive products like dairy while easing restrictions on non-controversial imports, such as certain nuts and fruits.
India’s reluctance to open its agriculture sector to the US is not merely about tariffs; it is a matter of economic survival, cultural identity, and food sovereignty. While free trade advocates may argue for greater openness, the reality for Indian farmers is starkly different. The country must protect its agricultural backbone while ensuring that trade negotiations do not disadvantage its most vulnerable citizens.
For India and the US, finding a common ground will require patience, diplomacy, and a deep understanding of each other’s economic realities. Until then, agriculture will remain a contentious chapter in the complex US-India trade relationship.